Operation Infuriated Punishment
jhohcable:

sawmuchded:

applebeansokay:

thegoodsonisbad:

ryxchordata:

apolloscoffeeshop:

how does a person see this in a store and actually think
“Yes. This is a shirt I’d like to wear on my body.”

The sad thing is that some girls at my school wear this


if i catch any of you wearing this shirt

im wearing this shirt right now : ^)

Whatever, I’m currently wearing 7 of this shirt at once

How many more sandwiches can be made?
And the answer is none.
None……….. more sandwich.

jhohcable:

sawmuchded:

applebeansokay:

thegoodsonisbad:

ryxchordata:

apolloscoffeeshop:

how does a person see this in a store and actually think

“Yes. This is a shirt I’d like to wear on my body.”

The sad thing is that some girls at my school wear this

if i catch any of you wearing this shirt

im wearing this shirt right now : ^)

Whatever, I’m currently wearing 7 of this shirt at once

How many more sandwiches can be made?

And the answer is none.

None……….. more sandwich.

permutationofninjas:

zenyattagal:

dearcispeople:

If you’re more offended by “die cis scum” than by people dying and being constantly abused, harassed, and threatened for simply existing, then you are no ally. Learn that cis does not automatically equal “cis scum.”

Just because there are more offensive things out there doesn’t mean it’s not offensive.
Die cis scum will never be an okay thing to say.

Yup.  Appeal to worse problems.Also, what’s to stop people from turning this right back to us.  Learn that trans does not automatically equal “tranny”.  Learn that black does not automatically equal “nigger”.  Learn that gay does not automatically equal “faggot”.  I have heard all of these, from people who you’d immediately attack as being oppressive, but it’s the exact same concept!  ”Oh, we don’t mean you, you’re one of the good [blacks/gays/transgenders/cis people]!”It’s exactly the same, and it’s exactly as degrading and insulting.  And saying that people can’t get offended by it is exactly what you claim to fight against.— Editor (and resident trans* kid) 

permutationofninjas:

zenyattagal:

dearcispeople:

If you’re more offended by “die cis scum” than by people dying and being constantly abused, harassed, and threatened for simply existing, then you are no ally. Learn that cis does not automatically equal “cis scum.”

Just because there are more offensive things out there doesn’t mean it’s not offensive.

Die cis scum will never be an okay thing to say.

Yup.  Appeal to worse problems.

Also, what’s to stop people from turning this right back to us.  Learn that trans does not automatically equal “tranny”.  Learn that black does not automatically equal “nigger”.  Learn that gay does not automatically equal “faggot”.  I have heard all of these, from people who you’d immediately attack as being oppressive, but it’s the exact same concept!  ”Oh, we don’t mean you, you’re one of the good [blacks/gays/transgenders/cis people]!”

It’s exactly the same, and it’s exactly as degrading and insulting.  And saying that people can’t get offended by it is exactly what you claim to fight against.

— Editor (and resident trans* kid) 

permutationofninjas:

lavender-labia:

nerdydyke:

Yes, certain crimes. Typically that involves if she kills a lot of people, or she kills her children or partner.

While women MAY be punished more harshly for certain crimes, men get punished more harshly in regards to every other crime. Therefore, wouldn’t…

I think it’s relevant to point out that the idea of male perpetrators generally causing greater injury isn’t necessarily true, as Dutton & Nicholls examine in the study found here.  While differences do exist, they’re not nearly as great as many advocates are claiming, and even then these levels are vulnerably to skewing due to societal norms.  We can see this in many earlier studies, particularly those working from crime data.  A woman who walks into a hospital looking like she’s been assaulted is very likely to be questioned as to whether she was a DV victim.  A man is less likely to be asked, and more likely to be believed if he claims other origin….not to mention less likely to seek medical attention in the first place.

The same problem affects many types of study, as any study that rates injury based on subjective interpretation or police data will overreport the injury to women, underreport the injury to men or both at once because men will (for various reasons) generally set the bar for “serious” or “severe” injury higher.  For example, most women would likely rate a black eye as “serious injury,” but many if not most men would likely consider it to be minor, especially if they’ve ever played contact sports.  When we add societal pressure for men to downplay their own injuries, especially injuries received at the hands of primarily female partners the skewing can become bad enough to render the data utterly misleading.

Even this itself is somewhat misleading, though, because when we look at the actual acts themselves we see that the disparity in injury we do see is likely a result of men simply being stronger or more durable rather than differing levels of violence.  It would almost sound like victim-blaming, actually, effectively claiming that men’s victimization “counts less” not because their attackers are less determined or vicious but simply because they’re better at defending themselves.  This seems to be an extension of the societal construct of “men as invulnerable” which allows us to ignore their victimization.

~Neko   

youdontneedfeminism:

childsupportnigga:

tforge13:

I highly doubt this’ll get as many notes as any Feminism posts, and I’ll likely lose a few followers for posting it. But discrimination against men IS a real thing.
Please, no matter your sex, gender, or political views, take a minute to read through this.
And please reblog. Don’t just like and leave it at that. This is a serious issue that many people don’t know about. I only just learned about it a week or two ago.

although no female should be forced to keep a pregnancy she doesn’t want, no matter what the reason for it is.

While I’m not sure of any specifics yet, as it’s a very complex issue, I don’t think women should be the only ones involved in the decisions. Again, the devil is in the details, and I am not saying I know how to make men more involved in abortion, but it needs to happen. Because it takes two to make that pregnancy, but for some reason only one person ever has any legal authority about the pregnancy. Of course, logically, the woman is the one who’s body is affected - but how abortion works now just makes men glorified turkey basters. 

youdontneedfeminism:

childsupportnigga:

tforge13:

I highly doubt this’ll get as many notes as any Feminism posts, and I’ll likely lose a few followers for posting it. But discrimination against men IS a real thing.

Please, no matter your sex, gender, or political views, take a minute to read through this.

And please reblog. Don’t just like and leave it at that. This is a serious issue that many people don’t know about. I only just learned about it a week or two ago.

although no female should be forced to keep a pregnancy she doesn’t want, no matter what the reason for it is.

While I’m not sure of any specifics yet, as it’s a very complex issue, I don’t think women should be the only ones involved in the decisions. Again, the devil is in the details, and I am not saying I know how to make men more involved in abortion, but it needs to happen. Because it takes two to make that pregnancy, but for some reason only one person ever has any legal authority about the pregnancy. Of course, logically, the woman is the one who’s body is affected - but how abortion works now just makes men glorified turkey basters. 

hoodoothatvoodoo:

Frank Horvat
Le Sphynx, rue Pigalle, Paris (Strip Tease G), 1956

hoodoothatvoodoo:

Frank Horvat

Le Sphynx, rue Pigalle, Paris (Strip Tease G), 1956

permutationofninjas:

(TW)

*Never once in recorded human history is there evidence to support that women were ever oppressed.

*Throughout all of human history, on an intersectional, cross-cultural level, men have been more oppressed than women.

*47% of rapes reported from women are lied about.

*Patriarchy does not exist.

*Patriarchy is actually a faux-organization feminists created.

*Women have more political power because we make up the majority of the human population and our populace alone can vote a person into power if we came to a consensus.

*The Toronto police officer who said “women shouldn’t dress like sluts if they don’t want to get raped,” [triggering the SlutWalk movement] is a “poor man,” “wrongly” attacked by the women he was just trying to “help.”

And you know what the scary part is?

They aren’t trolling.

They seriously believe this. ALL OF THIS.

Things that feminists have told me:

All men are potential rapists.

Men don’t get raped.

Women can not rape men.

Never once in recorded human history is there evidence to support that men were ever oppressed. 

This is what feminists actually believe.

If you see the obvious things wrong with my statement, you should be able to see the things wrong with yours.  A few members of a movement might be radscum, but that doesn’t really mean anything.  Otherwise I’d use the SCUM manifesto to represent your movement.

Also, I’d like to state that the feminist Patriarchy theory is very ill-defined and isn’t really worth anything, as its definition is different for every individual.  When someone mentions the Patriarchy, there’s really no way of telling what that person is actually talking about, and in that sense the Patriarchy does not exist.

-Derpjerk 

just-smith:

deeplezstonerwitch:

can we talk about why people feel more uncomfortable about misandry than misogyny?

No, because almost nobody cares about misandry. You’re complaining because for once you’re having to share the victim role, even slightly, and you can’t take it. 

it-goes-both-ways:

Holby city is known for having “strong” female characters but almost every female character in this programme is bitchy, argumentative, rude, aggressive, underhanded, smug, power hungry and treacherous. At the beginning of the episode one of the doctors gets hit by a car and the woman who comes…

it-goes-both-ways:

This raises an interesting point as to how men as a gender are being phased out. Where even their fertility and lifespan are decreasing. Men are just sperm donors and “optional extras”. Women say they want a man to be more emotional and less competitive and now that they are more “feminine” in that sense women like them less.

How far will it get?

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5